This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 914–925, doi:10.3762/bjnano.7.83
Figure 1: Schematical overview of the ECM fabrication process. First an original mold with a honeycomb struct...
Figure 2: SEM pictures of (a) the original molds (b) 1. imprints with a thin Al layer (c) 2. imprints with a ...
Figure 3: (a) Photography of the ECM samples prepared at a deposition angle of 60° and interpore distance of ...
Figure 4: The two principle angles, θ and , of incident light with respect to the ECM structures.
Figure 5: The resulting CD response from three ECM orientations (θ = 0°, = 0°), (θ = 12°, = 0°) and (θ = −1...
Figure 6: Angular scans and corresponding CD response from the ECM fabricated with 430 nm interpore distance ...
Figure 7: Angular scans with the intrinsic chirality subtracted. A much higher symmetrical CD response from t...
Figure 8: CD response from all the produced ECMs. (a) The CD response from the structures with 300 nm interpo...
Figure 9: Angular scans with large angle increments and corresponding the CD response from the ECM fabricated...
Figure 10: CD response from the ECM fabricated with 430 nm interpore distance and 50° glancing angle depositio...
Figure 11: CD response from a bare ECM and with a molecule adsorbed on the surface. (a) CD response with and w...
Figure 12: CD response from the ECM fabricated with 430 nm interpore distance and 50° glancing angle depositio...